Doctoral Project

MUPG 770 is for students who started the program prior to September 2019
MUPG 771 is for students who started the program from September 2019 and onwards.

The doctoral final project consists of a research paper and one of two options:
Option 1: Presentation of the research paper (35 minutes) followed by questions from the committee and the audience, and a final recital (60-70 minutes of music).
 

Option 2: A research paper and a lecture-recital (35 minutes plus 35 minutes) based on the research paper. The core subject matter is developed through the comprehensive examination process.

Deadlines

 

Graduation date

Project proposal

Recital Application Form Submission

Final day to hold final recital or lecture-recital

Paper Submission

Final Paper Submission with Revisions

Spring (May, June)

By October 15

By February 15 By May 7 By April 1 By May 1

Fall (October, November)

By February 15

April-May

By May 31 By August 1 By September 1

Winter (no convocation)

By August 15 By October 1 By December 15 By December 1 By Early January
  • One month before your project proposal is due:  Submit a complete draft to your advisory committee for approval.
  • Submit your project proposal to graduatestudies.music [at] mcgill.ca (Graduate Studies) by the deadline above. The proposal will be circulated to the Graduate Performance Sub-Committee for additional feedback.
  • At least three weeks before lecture-recital or presentation: Submit your presentation/lecture-recital draft (text and handout materials) to your advisory committee.
  • Email the final draft of your research paper to graduatestudies.music [at] mcgill.ca (Graduate Studies )for committee review and comments by the deadline above at the latest. Committee review will take about two weeks, after which you will make revisions as indicated.
  • Submit the final version of your research paper via email to graduatestudies.music [at] mcgill.ca (Graduate Studies) including revisions proposed by the committee, by the deadline above. Print waiver and library copyright documents required for submission of research theses and complete. Scan and attach to the final PDF. Indicate the number of your ethics approval document (if applicable), in your abstract.

Evaluation Criteria

The doctoral project is evaluated according to the following criteria:

  • Clarity of expression and the development of ideas;
  • Grasp of subject matter, awareness of previous work in the field, and critical thinking;
  • Contribution of research and its implications for performance practice;
  • Artistic quality and expression of musical performance.

A passing grade is dependent on completion of all components of the Doctoral Project.

Evaluation Committee

The doctoral project evaluation committee is normally the advisory committee set up during your first semester in the program.

Project Proposal

The project proposal includes:

  • A copy of the complete concert program and technical set-up requirements
  • A cover sheet signed by the Supervisor and the Co-Supervisor (Music Research Supervisor): PDF icon DMusLectureRecitalApplicationForm_19-20 [PDF]
  • A two-page project description (see below for guidelines)
  • A bibliography (one page)
  • Ethics documentation if human subjects are involved in your research
  • A chapter outline is recommended

Project Description Tips

An effective project description (2 pages) builds a clear vision of the artistic, historical or analytical framework guiding the work by:

  • Citing sources, performance practices and other artistic/scientific initiatives that have inspired the project;
  • Identifying a gap that your work will fill; and
  • Explicating the methodological choices, musical repertoire, scores, performers, composers, archives, historical instruments, rehearsal or creative strategies, and/or scholarly and analytical approaches that will be used.

It has two parts:

The introduction has a clear and concise title and opening impact that situates your topic. It concisely states what the goals and objectives; the methodology; why it is worth doing (originality, value, benefits), particularly as it informs performance practice.

The body points to the outcomes of the project by briefly describing what each work on the recital component contributes or will illustrate about the topic.

Option 1 – Paper Presentation and Final Recital

The presentation of the research paper is a 35-minute presentation of the content of your paper, typically using power point or handouts. The presentation is followed, by a short question/answer period with committee members and the audience.

The final recital consists of 60-70 minutes of music presented at a separate, later, occasion than the paper presentation.

Option 2 - Lecture-Recital

The lecture-recital includes 35 minutes of music followed by a 35-minute presentation defending your ideas and artistic/scientific approaches. Afterwards, there is a short question/answer period with committee members and then the audience.

The format is flexible, but there should be a handout or power point presentation (as with an academic paper). Identify musical examples or quotations with captions indicating source and page or measure numbers.

Paper

The paper is typically 50-100 pages plus bibliography and appendices. The paper should include:

  1. A title page (the title of the thesis; the name of the author and department followed by "McGill University, Montreal"; the month and year the paper was submitted; the following statement "A paper submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of D.Mus. Performance Studies"; the universal copyright notice followed by the author's name and the year the paper was submitted);
  2. a detailed table of contents;
  3. a brief abstract in English and French;
  4. an introduction that clearly states the rationale, objectives and originality of the research;
  5. chapters presenting different aspects of the topic as appropriate;
  6. a final conclusion and summary;
  7. a bibliography or reference list;
  8. recording of the lecture-recital performance if possible and applicable.

Final submission::

The following two (2) forms must be signed, scanned, and submitted to with your final e-Thesis submission.

1. McGill Thesis Non-Exclusive License (MNL) Form

McGill Library and Archives Canada (LAC) consider graduate theses important sources of original research, and make theses available in electronic form. As a thesis student you hold the copyright of your thesis. With your final thesis submission, you are required to sign two non-exclusive licenses, one with McGill and one with Library and Archives Canada. The McGill license permits McGill University to make your thesis available in electronic form through McGill’s repository eScholarship @ McGill. The license with Library and Archives Canada permits your thesis to be visible and accessible by creating bibliographic records available through the Theses Canada Portal. For more information, please consult the Library and Archives Canada website.

Complete only ONE of these forms (either the English or the French version) sign, and include with your final e-thesis submission.

2. Library and Archives Canada (LAC) Form

Complete only ONE of these forms (either the English or the French version) sign, and include with your final e-thesis submission.

  • The final copy must be accompanied by two forms which can be filled out and printed from the Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies website: the Library and Archives Canada Theses Non-Exclusive License form and the McGill Library Waiver form.

Ethics approval: If ethics approval is required for your research, note the ethics approval number and title in the paper abstract. Keep the original document and ensure that your supervisor also keeps a copy on file.

 

Back to top